adr156
https://bit.ly/3LeICnx https://bit.ly/3xpkj0i https://bit.ly/3eWuumU https://bit.ly/3Lkpy7d https://bit.ly/3xr6eiT https://bit.ly/3xqtr4J https://bit.ly/3dkqjR5 https://bit.ly/3Li96o7
In fact, if your post had just been focused on sharing your own vision of being taken in hand, I would have found it most interesting, and not felt compelled to respond at all.
But that is hardly to the point. My objection was to your use of the labels of submissive (and dominant) to define your need for being manhandled. For myself, the word "dominate" means precisely what it means - to control a place or a person - How that is done, and in what manner, is up to the individual. The same may be said about submission.
The way I see it, your submissive response is provoked by being roughed up a bit. You yourself have said that once your get your hit of rough-housing you are a happy obedient girl until you need another fix. For other women it might require a whip. Still others may only require a spoken word. It varies from girl to girl. But once brought to the surface, your submissive response is much like any other females, you do as you are told.
IOW – it is not the manner in which you are put in your place that makes you submissive, it is how you behave once you are in that place that defines your nature. You seem to be confusing the two. Even Eric seems to prefer the use of the term resistant rather than submissive.
So, from my perspective your nature is submissive, but you require your own kink to get you there. Not my cup of tea, I prefer girls who require less ongoing maintenace, but then again that is hardly the issue.
Have a good day.
Be seeing you,
Mackenzie [Road Warrior]/Taken In Hand
www.mackenziecross.ca
by mackenzie on 2004 Dec 22 - 13:20 | reply to this comment