bnxfdxsx2
https://bit.ly/3QIZJyO https://bit.ly/3S0HR3G https://bit.ly/3B8wpw1 https://bit.ly/3ByMuwq https://bit.ly/3BApIEg https://bit.ly/3QCDkTF https://bit.ly/3QCtGR5 https://bit.ly/3BbQHor
Perhaps I am overreacting, but I am always put off by the bias that many secularists have toward religion, especially the Christian faith. Unfortunately, many with little or no background in Christinaity, view it only in light of the American fundamentalists such as Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell. Christianity is a very big tent which includes within it many points of view. Would you be so kind as to explain why you think Taken In Hand is not about religion. Thanks.
Stephen
by a Taken In Hand reader on 2004 Sep 17 - 14:07 | reply to this comment What I meant about religion Hi Stephen,
It is perfectly fine to mention the relationship between your religion/faith and your Taken In Hand relationship. The only thing that is not acceptable is to use this site to promote a religious or political agenda. In other words, if it is on-topic for the site, I have no problem whatsoever with religious references. Indeed, if you go to the Quotations section, I have included a whole lot of quotes from the Bible, most of which I hunted down myself!
All I meant was that it is not necessarily about religion, i.e., that being religious is not a prerequisite for a Taken In Hand relationship. I certainly did not intend to imply that being religious is incompatible with a Taken In Hand relationship. The reason I included that bit is because I have been accused of submitting to my husband in accordance with the Christian Bible and of advocating Biblical submission for all woman, and of advocating ultra-traditional marriages. As a single, not-submissive atheist, I found that slightly galling. ;-) And I object to the contention by Taken In Hand critics that only religious people could possibly want a Taken In Hand relationship. If you can think of a succinct way to express that in the list, do let me know. I am very open to changing it.
Sarah
by Taken In Hand on 2004 Sep 17 - 14:33 | reply to this comment